Hyperscanner vs Passivbot
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Analytics & Data
Best for ResearchQuick Take
Hyperscanner Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM on Multi-Layer, while Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Hyperscanner and Passivbot. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Hyperscanner
Multi-LayerUnified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM
hyperscanner.appPassivbot
Multi-LayerOpen-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
github.comOverview
Hyperscanner
Hyperscanner is a unified analytics and data platform spanning both Hyperliquid L1 — the high-performance perpetuals exchange — and HyperEVM, the EVM-compatible smart contract execution layer. It addresses the fragmentation inherent in Hyperliquid's dual-chain architecture: traders and developers previously needed to consult disconnected explorers and dashboards to get a complete picture of ecosystem activity. Hyperscanner aggregates on-chain data into clean, accessible interfaces featuring real-time market overviews, token analytics, wallet tracking, volume trends, and trading signals derived from live chain activity. For traders, it offers a bird's-eye view of market conditions — open interest shifts, volume anomalies, and emerging token activity on HyperEVM. For developers and researchers, it provides an exploration and indexing layer for understanding ecosystem growth, protocol adoption, and on-chain behavior. By bridging the data gap between Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM in a single coherent product, Hyperscanner makes the ecosystem more legible and navigable — lowering the barrier for new participants and giving experienced users the signals they need to stay ahead of market developments.
Visit websitePassivbot
Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Analytics & Data | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | 2025 | — |
| Website | hyperscanner.app | github.com |
| @hyperscanner_io | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | analyticsscannersignalsmulti-layer | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✓ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Hyperscanner is focused on analytics & data, while Passivbot targets trading bots & automation. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Hyperscanner if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need features like analytics and scanner
- ✓Need: Unified analytics for Hyperliquid L1 and HyperEVM
Choose Passivbot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
Ecosystem Integration
Hyperscanner
Hyperscanner operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Passivbot
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Hyperscanner or Passivbot to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category