Passivbot vs HypurrScan
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while HypurrScan Hyperliquid L1 explorer — auctions, TWAPs, whales, and on-chain data on HyperCore. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Passivbot and HypurrScan. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Passivbot
Multi-LayerOpen-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
github.comHypurrScan
HyperCoreHyperliquid L1 explorer — auctions, TWAPs, whales, and on-chain data
hypurrscan.ioOverview
Passivbot
Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.
Visit websiteHypurrScan
HypurrScan is the dedicated block explorer and analytics platform for Hyperliquid's Layer 1 blockchain, offering comprehensive visibility into the network's on-chain activity. Analogous to Etherscan for Ethereum, HypurrScan is purpose-built for Hyperliquid's unique architecture — a high-performance consensus layer that powers fully on-chain perpetual futures and spot order books with sub-second finality. The explorer provides real-time and historical tracking of transactions, wallet addresses, token balances, TWAP (time-weighted average price) executions, and HIP-1 token auction prices. Users can drill into individual accounts to view their full trading history, open positions, and asset holdings across both spot and perpetuals markets. HypurrScan also surfaces network-level statistics including validator activity, block production data, and ecosystem metrics essential for researchers, traders, and developers building on Hyperliquid L1. As the Hyperliquid ecosystem has scaled — with billions in daily trading volume and hundreds of perpetual markets — HypurrScan has become an indispensable transparency tool. Its dashboard aggregates the most critical L1 data into a single interface optimized for both casual users and power analysts navigating the HYPE ecosystem.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperCore |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Analytics & Data |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | github.com | hypurrscan.io |
| — | @HypurrScan | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | exploreranalyticswhaleson-chain |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while HypurrScan runs on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Passivbot is focused on trading bots & automation, while HypurrScan targets analytics & data. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Passivbot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
Choose HypurrScan if you...
- ✓Want a analytics & data solution on HyperCore
- ✓Need features like explorer and analytics
- ✓Need: Hyperliquid L1 explorer — auctions, TWAPs, whales, and on-chain data
Ecosystem Integration
Passivbot
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
HypurrScan
HypurrScan operates on HyperCore (native on-chain perpetual orderbook). Running on HyperCore gives it direct access to the native orderbook with minimal latency and maximum throughput.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Passivbot or HypurrScan to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category