Passivbot vs HyperBot
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while HyperBot Telegram trading bot for executing Hyperliquid trades directly from chat on Multi-Layer. Both are trading bots & automation protocols on Multi-Layer, making them direct competitors in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Passivbot and HyperBot. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Passivbot
Multi-LayerOpen-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
github.com
HyperBot
Multi-LayerTelegram trading bot for executing Hyperliquid trades directly from chat
hyperbot.tradeOverview
Passivbot
Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.
Visit websiteHyperBot
HyperBot is a Telegram-based trading bot built natively for Hyperliquid, enabling users to trade perpetuals and spot assets directly from their Telegram interface without navigating a web app. With simple command syntax and an intuitive inline keyboard, HyperBot lets traders open and close positions, set stop-losses and take-profits, view their portfolio PnL, and receive real-time price alerts—all within Telegram. The bot supports both market and limit orders on all Hyperliquid-listed assets and offers one-click copy-trading for following top traders on the leaderboard. HyperBot's lightweight architecture means near-instant order routing to Hyperliquid's matching engine, with execution speeds comparable to the native interface. It has become an essential tool for mobile-first Hyperliquid traders who want the full trading experience in a messaging app, combining convenience with the full power of Hyperliquid's non-custodial perp and spot markets.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | — |
| Website | github.com | hyperbot.trade |
| — | — | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | — |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Similar Profiles
Both Passivbot and HyperBot are trading bots & automation protocols on Multi-Layer. The key differentiators will be in their specific implementations, UX, liquidity depth, and community traction.
When to Use Each
Choose Passivbot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
Choose HyperBot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Telegram trading bot for executing Hyperliquid trades directly from chat
Ecosystem Integration
Passivbot
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
HyperBot
HyperBot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Passivbot or HyperBot to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category