Passivbot vs HyperZap
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while HyperZap Telegram bot for one-click HyperEVM token trading and portfolio tracking on HyperEVM. Both compete in the trading bots & automation space but operate on different layers, which affects their capabilities and composability.
Based on public data for Passivbot and HyperZap. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Passivbot
Multi-LayerOpen-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
github.com
HyperZap
HyperEVMTelegram bot for one-click HyperEVM token trading and portfolio tracking
hyperzap.ioOverview
Passivbot
Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.
Visit websiteHyperZap
HyperZap is a fast-trading platform available as both a Telegram bot and web interface, designed for rapid execution of trades on HYPE and HyperEVM tokens. In the fast-moving world of crypto, speed is everything — new token launches, arbitrage windows, and momentum trades demand execution in seconds. HyperZap solves this by letting users configure their wallet once and then trade with a single command or button tap, eliminating the friction of navigating DEX interfaces, approving transactions, and waiting for confirmations. The Telegram bot is particularly powerful for mobile-first traders who want to enter new HyperEVM listings or take profits without opening a browser. Features include limit orders, auto-slippage management, real-time price tracking, and wallet management for HyperEVM assets. The web platform adds charts, portfolio tracking, and batch trading capabilities. HyperZap also supports token sniping — automatically buying at launch — and copy-trading features that let users mirror top wallets on HyperEVM. As the HyperEVM ecosystem grows with new token launches daily, HyperZap serves as the go-to execution layer for traders who prioritize speed, simplicity, and mobile accessibility above all else.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperEVM |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Trading Bots & Automation |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | github.com | hyperzap.io |
| — | @hyperzap_io | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | Telegrambotzapportfolio |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while HyperZap runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
When to Use Each
Choose Passivbot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
Choose HyperZap if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Need features like Telegram and bot
- ✓Need: Telegram bot for one-click HyperEVM token trading and portfolio tracking
Ecosystem Integration
Passivbot
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
HyperZap
HyperZap operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Passivbot or HyperZap to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category