PERP.WIKI

Passivbot vs Hyperbloom

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation

Best for Traders
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while Hyperbloom DEX aggregator and autocompounding yield optimizer on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Passivbot and Hyperbloom. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Passivbot

Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.

Visit website
Hyperbloom logo

Hyperbloom

HyperBloom is a DeFi SuperApp built on HyperEVM that combines a DEX aggregator with auto-compounding yield vaults, delivering best-in-class swap rates and maximized APYs across the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Its aggregator routes trades through a unified smart contract that covers liquidity from 10 integrated DEXs — including HyperSwap, KittenSwap, Curve, Laminar, Gliquid, Hybra, HyperCat, ProjectX, Valantis, and Ramses — plus HyperCore order-book depth, all settled in a single non-custodial transaction with no custody risk. For yield seekers, HyperBloom's auto-compounding vaults employ a proprietary YieldIQ strategy: on-chain algorithms that dynamically optimize liquidity positions, compound rewards continuously, and minimize unnecessary rebalancing and gas costs. Vaults support single-token deposits, eliminating the complexity of fixed 50/50 LP ratios and letting users retain directional preference over their underlying assets. Vault tokens represent proportional claims on deposits plus accumulated yield, redeemable at any time. HyperBloom also features a liquidity locker, a developer-facing widget API, and a points program — making it a comprehensive infrastructure layer for traders, LPs, and protocols building on HyperEVM.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeaturePassivbotHyperbloom logoHyperbloom
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryTrading Bots & AutomationYield & Vaults
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitegithub.comhyperbloom.xyz
Twitter@hyperbloomxyz
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
DEX-aggregatoryieldautocompounding

Score Comparison

PassivbotHyperbloom
Open Source
Passivbot
Not public
Hyperbloom
Not public
Verified
Passivbot
Unverified
Hyperbloom
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Passivbot
0 tags
Hyperbloom
3 tags
Maturity
Passivbot
Unknown
Hyperbloom
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeaturePassivbotHyperbloom logoHyperbloom
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Hyperbloom runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Passivbot is focused on trading bots & automation, while Hyperbloom targets yield & vaults. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Passivbot if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support

Choose Hyperbloom if you...

  • Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like DEX-aggregator and yield
  • Need: DEX aggregator and autocompounding yield optimizer

Ecosystem Integration

Passivbot

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Hyperbloom logo

Hyperbloom

Hyperbloom operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Passivbot or Hyperbloom to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons