PERP.WIKI

Passivbot vs Okotoki

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation

Best for Traders
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while Okotoki Professional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid power users on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Passivbot and Okotoki. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Passivbot

Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.

Visit website
Okotoki logo

Okotoki

Okotoki is a professional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid, offering a sophisticated interface for active perpetuals traders who need more than the native UI. Okotoki's multi-panel layout supports side-by-side charting of multiple assets, a full order entry panel with advanced order types, and a live order book visualizer that renders Hyperliquid's L2 order book depth in real time. Its built-in trade journal automatically records entries and exits with P&L attribution, helping traders analyze performance over time. Okotoki also includes a position heat map showing portfolio-level exposure and risk metrics for perp positions. By combining the speed of Hyperliquid's matching engine with a feature-rich trading interface, Okotoki caters to the growing cohort of professional traders who have migrated from CEXes to Hyperliquid and demand institutional-grade tooling without sacrificing the non-custodial benefits of decentralized trading.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeaturePassivbotOkotoki logoOkotoki
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryTrading Bots & AutomationTrading Terminals & Interfaces
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitegithub.comokotoki.com
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

PassivbotOkotoki
Open Source
Passivbot
Not public
Okotoki
Not public
Verified
Passivbot
Unverified
Okotoki
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Passivbot
0 tags
Okotoki
0 tags
Maturity
Passivbot
Unknown
Okotoki
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeaturePassivbotOkotoki logoOkotoki
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Category Focus

Passivbot is focused on trading bots & automation, while Okotoki targets trading terminals & interfaces. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Passivbot if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support

Choose Okotoki if you...

  • Want a trading terminals & interfaces solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Professional trading terminal purpose-built for Hyperliquid power users

Ecosystem Integration

Passivbot

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Okotoki logo

Okotoki

Okotoki operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Passivbot or Okotoki to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons