Passivbot vs RedStone
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while RedStone Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM on Multi-Layer. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Passivbot and RedStone. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Passivbot
Multi-LayerOpen-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
github.comRedStone
Multi-LayerOracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM
redstone.financeOverview
Passivbot
Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.
Visit websiteRedStone
RedStone is a modular blockchain oracle network that has become the dominant oracle solution on Hyperliquid, operating under the HyperStone brand for the ecosystem. Oracles are critical infrastructure — they provide smart contracts with real-world price feeds, enabling DeFi lending, derivatives, and synthetic assets to function correctly. RedStone's architecture is uniquely well-suited to Hyperliquid's high-performance environment: rather than pushing price updates to the chain on every tick (a costly approach), RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is fetched on-demand and cryptographically verified on-chain, dramatically reducing costs while maintaining freshness and accuracy. Securing approximately 99.5% of oracle-protected value on Hyperliquid, HyperStone feeds power a wide range of DeFi protocols on HyperEVM — from lending markets to perpetual protocols and yield vaults. RedStone aggregates price data from dozens of sources, applying outlier filtering and cryptographic attestation to ensure data integrity. With support for hundreds of assets and sub-second update latency, HyperStone gives Hyperliquid's DeFi ecosystem enterprise-grade price feeds, enabling complex financial products to be built with confidence in the underlying data infrastructure.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | Multi-Layer |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Oracles |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2022 |
| Website | github.com | redstone.finance |
| — | @redstone_defi | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | ✓ Verified |
| Tags | — | oracleHyperStoneprice-feedsHIP-3 |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Category Focus
Passivbot is focused on trading bots & automation, while RedStone targets oracles. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Passivbot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
Choose RedStone if you...
- ✓Want a oracles solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Prefer a verified and vetted protocol
- ✓Need features like oracle and HyperStone
- ✓Need: Oracle powering ~99.5% of oracle-protected value on HyperEVM
Ecosystem Integration
Passivbot
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
RedStone
RedStone operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Passivbot or RedStone to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category