Passivbot vs Resolv
Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation
Best for TradersQuick Take
Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while Resolv Delta-neutral stablecoin protocol — USR backed by ETH with HL funding rates on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
Based on public data for Passivbot and Resolv. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.
Passivbot
Multi-LayerOpen-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
github.comResolv
HyperEVMDelta-neutral stablecoin protocol — USR backed by ETH with HL funding rates
resolv.xyzOverview
Passivbot
Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.
Visit websiteResolv
Resolv is a delta-neutral stablecoin protocol offering a three-layer financial system for stable, low-risk crypto yield. Its flagship product, USR (Resolv USD), is a crypto-native stable asset pegged to $1 and backed by ETH collateral offset by corresponding short derivatives positions — eliminating directional market exposure entirely. Unlike algorithmic stablecoins, USR maintains full collateral backing at all times, accrues yield intraday, and can be redeemed instantly with no lockups. RLP (Resolv Liquidity Pool) is a complementary leveraged yield product for advanced users who act as a protocol buffer, absorbing risk in exchange for higher returns. Resolv's modular vault architecture allocates capital across diverse yield sources: ETH staking, perpetual futures funding, lending markets, and tokenized real-world assets. All collateral movements are transparent and auditable via on-chain proof-of-reserves dashboards. USR consistently outperforms U.S. Treasury rates while maintaining a best-in-class collateral coverage ratio. Within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, Resolv provides a yield-bearing stable layer integrating with lending protocols, DEXs, and treasury strategies — offering institutions, DAOs, and DeFi protocols a capital-efficient alternative to idle stablecoins.
Visit websiteFeature Comparison
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer | Multi-Layer | HyperEVM |
| Category | Trading Bots & Automation | Yield & Vaults |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Launch Year | — | 2025 |
| Website | github.com | resolv.xyz |
| — | @ResolvLabs | |
| GitHub | Not public | Not public |
| Verified | Unverified | Unverified |
| Tags | — | stablecoinUSRdelta-neutralfunding-rates |
Score Comparison
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Passivbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✗ |
| Has Website | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has Twitter | ✗ | ✓ |
| Has GitHub | ✗ | ✗ |
| Active Status | ✓ | ✓ |
Key Differences
Layer Architecture
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Resolv runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.
Category Focus
Passivbot is focused on trading bots & automation, while Resolv targets yield & vaults. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
When to Use Each
Choose Passivbot if you...
- ✓Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
- ✓Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support
Choose Resolv if you...
- ✓Want a yield & vaults solution on HyperEVM
- ✓Need features like stablecoin and USR
- ✓Need: Delta-neutral stablecoin protocol — USR backed by ETH with HL funding rates
Ecosystem Integration
Passivbot
Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.
Resolv
Resolv operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.
Community Verdict
Which do you prefer?
Share your experience with Passivbot or Resolv to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.
Related Comparisons
Explore more projects in this category