PERP.WIKI

Passivbot vs Timeswap

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation

Best for Traders
Different Focus Areas

Quick Take

Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while Timeswap Oracle-less, non-liquidatable lending protocol on HyperEVM on HyperEVM. They serve different niches in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Passivbot and Timeswap. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Passivbot

Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.

Visit website
Timeswap logo

Timeswap

Timeswap is a fully decentralized, oracle-free lending and borrowing protocol deployed on HyperEVM. It solves one of DeFi's most persistent structural problems: the fragility of oracle-dependent liquidation systems, which expose borrowers to cascading liquidations during volatile markets. Timeswap replaces this model with a novel three-variable AMM — balancing principal, interest, and collateral — that allows lenders and borrowers to set their own terms without relying on external price feeds. Borrowers deposit collateral and select a maturity date; if the loan is repaid before maturity, they reclaim their collateral in full. If not, the collateral transfers to lenders — creating a liquidation-free experience where the worst-case outcome is transparent and defined upfront. This design makes Timeswap uniquely well-suited for long-tail and volatile assets that oracle-dependent protocols cannot safely list. On HyperEVM, Timeswap gains access to Hyperliquid's deep liquidity, active trader community, and expanding DeFi ecosystem, enabling it to serve assets native to the chain. For yield seekers, it offers fixed-rate lending with clearly defined risk parameters; for borrowers, it removes the anxiety of unexpected liquidation.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeaturePassivbotTimeswap logoTimeswap
LayerMulti-LayerHyperEVM
CategoryTrading Bots & AutomationLending & Borrowing
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year2025
Websitegithub.comtimeswap.io
Twitter@TimeswapLabs
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags
lendingoracle-lessfixed-ratenon-liquidatableTIME

Score Comparison

PassivbotTimeswap
Open Source
Passivbot
Not public
Timeswap
Not public
Verified
Passivbot
Unverified
Timeswap
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Passivbot
0 tags
Timeswap
5 tags
Maturity
Passivbot
Unknown
Timeswap
Since 2025

Feature Matrix

FeaturePassivbotTimeswap logoTimeswap
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Layer Architecture

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers), while Timeswap runs on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). This affects composability, transaction speed, and the types of integrations each protocol supports.

Category Focus

Passivbot is focused on trading bots & automation, while Timeswap targets lending & borrowing. They serve different user needs within the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

When to Use Each

Choose Passivbot if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support

Choose Timeswap if you...

  • Want a lending & borrowing solution on HyperEVM
  • Need features like lending and oracle-less
  • Need: Oracle-less, non-liquidatable lending protocol on HyperEVM

Ecosystem Integration

Passivbot

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Timeswap logo

Timeswap

Timeswap operates on HyperEVM (evm smart contracts on hyperliquid l1). As a HyperEVM protocol, it can compose with other EVM-based DeFi primitives and leverage smart contract flexibility.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Passivbot or Timeswap to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons