PERP.WIKI

Passivbot vs Vybe

Hyperliquid ecosystem comparison · Trading Bots & Automation

Best for Traders
Direct Competitors

Quick Take

Passivbot Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support on Multi-Layer, while Vybe Trading intelligence and copy-trading platform tailored for Hyperliquid on Multi-Layer. Both are trading bots & automation protocols on Multi-Layer, making them direct competitors in the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Based on public data for Passivbot and Vybe. Key differentiators: layer deployment, fee structure, liquidity depth, and community adoption. Last reviewed: Mar 2026.

Overview

Passivbot

Passivbot is a popular open-source cryptocurrency trading bot with native Hyperliquid support, implementing recursive grid-trading and DCA (dollar-cost averaging) strategies for perpetual futures markets. Written in Python with a strong community following, Passivbot allows traders to run fully automated grid strategies on Hyperliquid's perp markets without relying on centralized exchange APIs. The bot continuously places limit orders in a dynamic grid around the current price, capturing bid-ask spreads and mean-reversion moves. Passivbot includes an advanced backtesting engine and optimization framework that uses evolutionary algorithms to tune strategy parameters across historical data. With active maintenance, extensive documentation, and a dedicated Discord community, Passivbot has become one of the most trusted open-source tools for automated Hyperliquid trading. Its transparent, auditable codebase makes it particularly appealing to traders who are wary of closed-source bot solutions.

Visit website
Vybe logo

Vybe

Vybe is a trading intelligence and automation platform tailored for Hyperliquid, combining on-chain analytics with automated execution capabilities. Vybe tracks whale wallet activity, large order flows, and statistical edges across Hyperliquid's perp markets, translating these signals into actionable trade alerts and auto-execution triggers. Users can subscribe to curated signal providers, backtest signal performance against Hyperliquid's historical data, and set up automated responses to predefined market conditions. Vybe's copy-trading feature enables retail traders to mirror the positions of verified profitable traders on Hyperliquid in real-time, with configurable position sizing and risk limits. Its analytics dashboard provides deep insights into funding rates, open interest changes, and liquidation heatmaps, making Vybe a comprehensive trading intelligence layer for serious Hyperliquid participants who want data-driven automation rather than manual order entry.

Visit website

Feature Comparison

FeaturePassivbotVybe logoVybe
LayerMulti-LayerMulti-Layer
CategoryTrading Bots & AutomationTrading Bots & Automation
StatusActiveActive
Launch Year
Websitegithub.comvybe.trade
Twitter
GitHubNot publicNot public
VerifiedUnverifiedUnverified
Tags

Score Comparison

PassivbotVybe
Open Source
Passivbot
Not public
Vybe
Not public
Verified
Passivbot
Unverified
Vybe
Unverified
Ecosystem Breadth
Passivbot
0 tags
Vybe
0 tags
Maturity
Passivbot
Unknown
Vybe
Unknown

Feature Matrix

FeaturePassivbotVybe logoVybe
Open Source
Verified
Has Website
Has Twitter
Has GitHub
Active Status

Key Differences

Similar Profiles

Both Passivbot and Vybe are trading bots & automation protocols on Multi-Layer. The key differentiators will be in their specific implementations, UX, liquidity depth, and community traction.

When to Use Each

Choose Passivbot if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Open-source grid trading bot with native Hyperliquid perpetuals support

Choose Vybe if you...

  • Want a trading bots & automation solution on Multi-Layer
  • Need: Trading intelligence and copy-trading platform tailored for Hyperliquid

Ecosystem Integration

Passivbot

Passivbot operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Vybe logo

Vybe

Vybe operates on Multi-Layer (spans multiple hyperliquid layers). Spanning multiple layers lets it combine the strengths of each, though integration complexity is higher.

Both protocols share the same layer, maximizing composability potential.

Community Verdict

Which do you prefer?

Share your experience with Passivbot or Vybe to help others in the Hyperliquid community make better decisions.

Related Comparisons

Explore more projects in this category